Shrewsbury away in the cup would be most top teams dream of a fourth round tie. But following Everton crumbling in the third round many pundits had this one down as the banana-skin tie of the round. That Chelsea won at a canter says a lot for how far they have come and something about how far Everton have to go.
Chelsea played aggressively, and that’s the correct attitude. There’s no point pussy-footing around with opponents who believe they will have to scrap for ninety minutes if they are going to get anywhere. Without showing any disrespect Chelsea set about showing that they could match their opponents for physicality.
In particular the forwards Luke Rodgers and Nigel Jemson were given a rough ride. Rodgers, the pacy and tricky Shrewsbury forward, who unravelled the Everton defence in the third round, was bundled into the ground on a number of occasions. His effectiveness diminished as the tie wore on and the result got more and more certain. Jemson had to have treatment to his head on two occasions in the first half, and his desire for the scrap had faded before half-time.
Once Chelsea had demonstrated their physical prowess they then had the additional edge of talent and stamina that a lower division side could never handle.
Why was this so different to the third round. Quite simply Everton thought they would win and tried to outplay their opposition. By the time they realised they were in trouble Shrewsbury had too much confidence and were throwing crosses into the Everton box that Everton eventually failed to deal with. Although Everton got back onto level terms this seemed to be the moment they relaxed again and yielded the initiative. When Nigel Jemson is strolling into the box, unchallenged for headers it’s clear your defenders have overindulged at Christmas.
The pity was that Everton versus Chelsea would have been the tie of the fourth round. But who could begrudge an old-fashioned manager a giant-killing win over the team he supported as a child and went on to captain them through their most successful years.
Perhaps the two points that tonight separate fifth placed Everton and fourth placed Chelsea in the Premiership are more indicative of the respective managers. It is clear that David Moyes gets more from his players week after week than their collective talents should enable him to. But perhaps he cannot raise them for the one offs. Everton have lost 7 league games, all to teams in the top 12 and have avoided defeat against the top 4 teams just once this season, when Wayne Rooney burst into the public eye with his late winner against Arsenal. It appears that Everton are at or even above their true potential most of the time, a fabulous endorsement for a young manager.
Whereas Chelsea have lost to West Ham and Leeds in addition to dropped points against Middlesbrough, Bolton and Fulham. One other statistic that hurts Chelsea is that they have won only 4 times by a single goal, which suggests that they are uncomfortable in pressure situations – the top 3 have between 6 and 8 one goal wins to their names. Chelsea may not be the soft touch they were once, but they are still not title material when they are this careless in winnable games. So perhaps Ranieri isn’t taking Chelsea to it’s potential height this season, thus suggesting that Chelsea could be a genuine title challenger next season.
So Chelsea have quality to spare and Everton are playing on the edge and it took a small border town to expose the gap in potential between the top two blue shirted teams in England.