Holland travel to Austria and Switzerland for Euro 2008 with significantly lower expectations than those ordinarily foisted upon them. The draw, injury doubts and the presence of what is effectively a lame duck coach are all factors contributing to the dampening of the Dutch mood. Not only have Marco van Basten’s side been handed the considerable task of fending off at least one of Italy or France for the right to get out of Group C, they are also joined in the section by a Romanian side which took four points out of six from the Oranje in qualifying. Indeed, it was the Romanians who topped the section, although van Basten’s men qualified with reasonable comfort. They held off the challenge of Bulgaria despite losing their final game 2-1 to Belarus. Yet the lowering of expectations might be helpful to Holland. So often they have been tipped for great things at major tournaments, only to flatter to deceive at crunch times. Opinions differ on the reasons for this. Their penchant for an in-house row is legendary, while some say that their Devil-may-care approach once known as Total Football is in part responsible for the fact that they have only ever claimed one major international prize. It’s 20 years since van Basten’s ludicrous volley helped a side featuring Ruud Gullit, Frank Rijkaard and company claim the European title in West Germany. Now the Devil is not the only one who cares. Belying his flamboyant approach as a player, van Basten has noted the need for a little more caution. An element of this is forced upon him as the Dutch midfield now seems to lack the creativity of years gone by. Along with the manager, gone are the Gullits, the De Boers and the Bergkamps which made Holland so attractive to watch in years gone by. Alleged discussions with his players has seemingly led van Basten to compensate for this dearth of imagination by employing two screening midfielders in front of the back four. Most likely to fulfil these roles are AZ Alkmaar’s Demy de Zeeuw and former Arsenal left-back Gio van Bronckhorst. Hardly likely to inspire, nor is the fact that Van Basten steps down after the tournament to take over at Ajax and be replaced by Bart van Marwijk. If there are to be any out-of-the-box moments they will likely come from Rafael van de Vaart and Robin van Persie. The pair look set to line up in an advanced midfield three either side of Wesley Sneijder, with Ruud van Nistelrooy leading the line with his limitless eye for a tap-in. The trouble is that both van Persie and van Nistelrooy have spent much of the season sidelined with injury. It is a tough ask for them to be at their best when the tournament comes around, so doubts must remain. Van Nistelrooy is reasonably well backed up by Celtic’s Jan Venegoor of Hesselink and Ajax’s Klaas Jan Huntelaar (although the last highly rated Dutch goal-getter morphed into Dirk Kuyt). Yet with Arjen Robben’s recent injury woes there seem few alternatives should van Persie fail to fire. All of which puts the pressure even more fimly on van der Vaart and Sneijder to provide the spark. Liverpool’s Ryan Babel would have put significantly more fear into opponents’ hearts a year ago, but has endured a season with the Anfield club which can best be described as enigmatic. Defensively the Dutch look less than convincing. Fans of the Oranje may breathe a sigh of relief at van Basten’s decision to leave behind Chelsea liability Khalid Bouhlarouz, but the smile may be wiped from their faces with news that this is a Dutch back four which may well have to rely on the modest talents of Wigan’s Mario Melchiot and Blackburn’s accident prone Andre Ooijer. Aston Villa’s Wilfred Bouma battles with Feyenoord’s Tim de Cler for the left-back berth, and there is yet more Premier League interest in goal in the shape of Edwin van der Sar. The Manchester United stopper has hardly been his side’s most consistent performer this season, but can still point to the medals on his chest as evidence that he can cut at this level. He too steps down from the international scene once Holland’s race is run. Which might be as early as June 13 should they fail to take any points from their first two games against Italy in Berne on June 9, and France in the same city four days hence. It might just be that Holland’s best hope is to go all out for victory against both World Cup finalists, rather than play cautiously and leave themselves needing a result against their bogey side on June 17. In truth it is difficult to see Holland emerging unscathed from this tough first phase. Perhaps they should put their faith in the well trotted-out truism that there are always shocks in major tournaments. For once Holland will hope to be the shockers rather than the shocked. By Stephen Orford 31 May 2008